You're just some right-wing fanatic. Soros is trying to make the world a better place, while people like you try to make it worse. And speaking of buying elections...

You're just some right-wing fanatic. Soros is trying to make the world a better place, while people like you try to make it worse.

Now let's turn that statement around for a sec, shall we?

'You're just some LEFT wing fanatic.  BUSH is trying to make the world a better place, while people like you make it worse.'

There, that makes much more sense!!

"I can only assume that you have joined some monestery for the next for years as you promised."

Don't bet on it. It's one thing to talk the talk, it's another to walk the walk.

In addition to apocolyptic pronouncements of doom, the bedwetter set has notoriously poor follow through
on their promises. The Moores, Madonnas, Baldwins, and various others swore up and down that they'd
on the first plane out of the US the day Bush that was re-elected. Last time this happened, nary a
one followed through. I wouldn't put much stock in their integrity this time, either.

The Moores, Madonnas, Baldwins, and various others swore up and down that they'd on the first plane out of the US the day Bush that was re-elected.

They might still, but they'd have to leave a forwarding address for the royalty checks. I love it when people, enriched beyond your wildest dreams and mine by the opportunities available in this wonderful country, threaten us with leaving it if things don't go their way. Of course, they would live nowhere else, and it's empty rhetoric. Except maybe for Robert Redford, who may be serious about it. Somehow, I think I'll survive his departure.

Cheers,
Daiwa

... and neither did the German jews in the 1930's.


Oy.

"Except maybe for Robert Redford, who may be serious about it. Somehow, I think I'll survive his departure."

The only one I can think of who actually did it was Johnny Depp. That's one out of about two hundred or so. Which puts the
integrity factor at around one half of one percent, which is about right.

These self-indulgent and self-absorbed prima donnas fail to understand two things. First, if you make a threat on the grounds
of moral outrage, failure to honour it shows your hypocracy, rendering any claim of morality moot. Secondly, only their swollen
egos permit them to think such a threat means anything in the first place.

More than anything, these temper tantrums remind me of my nephews. "Do what I want or I'll hold my breath until I turn blue"
is not much of a threat. From two year olds, at least, it's expected. From middle aged artists and musicians, it's just pathetic.

"... and neither did the German jews in the 1930's."

1. Resorting to Godwin in your FIRST POST shows the moral bankruptcy of your position; and

2. Jews in 1930s Germany neither threatened to leave the country should Hitler be
elected, nor did they legally have much option to do so.

As with most Neiman Marxists, you don't differentiate between actual suffering and
petty inconvenience. So long as that attitude prevails, the Democrats are not going
to be winning any elections soon.

They've lost the Senate, the White House, and even Daschle; but instead of actually
addressing the reasons, they continue to lash out bitterly. Quite frankly, it's gotten
old.

If there's any comparisons to be made to the attitudes of 1930's Germany, it's
not the Republicans that resemble the Nazis, it's the Democrats rioting in the street
and pushing people down staircases last night in San Francisco; publicly praying
for a recession and an increase in fatalities in Iraq, and looking to psychotics
like Michael Moore as their moral center. The sad thing is, he *is* the moral
center of the Democrats, which is why they're so damned unlikable.

First, if you make a threat on the grounds of moral outrage, failure to honour it shows your hypocracy, rendering any claim of morality moot.

ive always wanted to ask g gordon liddy why he allowed himself to be captured alive. 

I'am just a bloke from far away (Australia) occasionally watching "the big show" of your presidential race.
I susspect that, despite what you have written, you liked another white guy from abroad helping G.W.B. to stay on his post, by paying a diplomatic visit just before the polling day (however inapropriate it was).
We all know, or at least used to know, that for a democracy to exist we have to make our choices when there is time for it, but to be back together afterwards. Denigrating those who found themselves on the loosing side is a rather low attitude.
Nothing is stable in our times, and there are more and more fanatics, and less and less good people.
Time will tell whether you will be enjoying your life in harmony or you will eat up your words...
iPeter from Australia

The democrats simply don't get it. They simply do not get the fact that the great majority of America despises the far-left wing. That people like Michael Moore, George Soros, and the rest of the liberal "elite" do nothing but turn stomachs and sway voters to George Bush. They think that losing gives them the right to resort to thuggery, yet would claim that its REPUBLICANS threatening people and trying to disenfranchise minorities. Plenty of anti-Bush books have been written in the last year. But George Bush' campaign didn't call on bookstores to ban them, and threaten lawsuits for non-compliance. No, that would have been the Kerry campaign, in response to the "Unfit for Command" book. Liberal rhetoric is so full of contradictions that its long since lost any touch whatsoever with reality.

Reply By: Subatai_Ba'adur Posted: Thursday, November 04, 2004 You're just some right-wing fanatic. Soros is trying to make the world a better place, while people like you try to make it worse. And speaking of buying elections...

As long as you continue to beleive that tripe, you will always lose. SO I will not try to convince you otherwise. I dont like arguing with brick walls, altho they are much saner.

Have you right wingers even looked up the history of Soros? I suspect not.

Some of us "right wingers" are quite familiar with Mr. Soros, even to the point of allying with him in certain political efforts. Believe it or not, this "right winger" endorsed and lent his name to the effort to legalize marijuana for medical use in Arizona, which was heavily underwritten by Mr. Soros. I think he was wrong in his assessment of Mr. Bush, but there are areas where I agree with his views.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Reply #15 By: Americans For Truth - 11/8/2004 2:57:17 PM Have you right wingers even looked up the history of Soros? I suspect not.

I have absolutely NO respect for George Soros! He tried to influence an election with his money! Not good.
"I will spend my entire fortune to make sure George Bush does not get re-elected"

Have you right wingers even looked up the history of Soros? I suspect not.

Yes, and what is your point? He is just another money grubbing capitalist from an eastern block country.

Have you ever researched anything about Bush, other than what was spoon fed you from the likes of the DNC< MM and Soros? I think not.