So, yesterday, I was perusing the latest edition of Time magazine. For some reason, I always start at the last page and go backwards...call me crazy. The last article in Time magazine is always an op-ed piece that usually irriates me but rarely surprises me.
While reading last week's aggravating piece entitled "The Battle is Over, but the War Goes On" by Michelle Cottie, I came across this paragraph:
"Democrats found this election discombobulating because no matter how often they hear about a divided America, most blue staters-especially coastal elite types-still don't quite grasp that their world view is not shared by everyone. Day to day, liberals have the luxury of ignoring conservative America. Only occasionally does some red-state phenomenon like The Passion of the Christ intrude on our consciousness, and even then it's usually because of some outrage it sparks among a particular interest group on the left."
Excuse me? "The Passion of the Christ" was a red-state phenomenon? Really? No one in a "blue-state" went to see this movie? Did some one from a "red-state" direct this movie or produce it?
Michelle Cottie completely showed the ignorance of the Democratic party. This kind of thinking is exactly why the Democrats are seen as out of touch with the American public. I know Democrats, Republicans, Christians, Jews, red-staters, and blue-staters that not only went to see this movie, but actually liked it.
So tell me my friends, from both sides of the political spectrum, do you also view "The Passion of the Christ" as a red-state phenomenon?